Religions teach the value of human life, and they provide
meaning for it. Religious people are an interesting bunch. Some of them like
the Red Sox. Some have a Rochester accent. Some are avid gardeners. Some come
from secular households. Some are Republicans. Some are Lord of the Rings fans. Some are left-handed. Some have never
questioned their sexual orientation. Some are war veterans. Some are divorced. I think you get the idea. There is more to
religious people than their beliefs, and when you call upon a religious person,
you’re getting all of that person, from her allergies to the allegories she
uses to understand the world around her. Because each person understands her
world uniquely based on her teachings emphasized by her experiences, there tend
to be disagreements.
Disagreements are a little like plastic bags. If we’re
acting like infants, we can suffocate in our disagreements when we insist that
there is room for just one right view and we all fight over it. If instead we
utilize our disagreements to carry forth multiple perspectives, we find that
our differences are a source of strength.
Does that sound hokey to you? I admit I had a difficult time
fully believing “diversity is strength.” I wanted to believe it, but if you’re
a teacher and you catch the end of a fist fight between two of your students,
and you get a diversity of viewpoints about what happened, how does that put
you in a position of strength if each story contradicts the others?
It took me a long time to understand that I’m engrained or
socialized to search for one truth, and by default, anything that contradicts
that truth is false. But reality is not that simple. There isn’t an
all-encompassing right and wrong, true and false, good and bad. In the case of
the fist fight, what if none of the accounts is accurate? Your diverse stories each
have some truth in them. Your strength comes from sifting the stories and
weighing out a possible reality.
Extrapolating from this example, I find it easier to believe
that this country has a lot of potential because it is the home of individuals
with extremely diverse experiences and backgrounds. We face so much social
inequality, and our values and socio-economic landscape won’t stop shifting!
Instead of assuming there’s one right or best way to attack a problem, if we
recognize that different methods work better in different regions, we’ll need
the diversity of experiences our people have cultivated.
I recently started to understand another reason to
appreciate differences and disagreements. Two nights ago, I was delighted to
talk with a Chautauquan who explained to me that real interfaith dialogue (where
we don’t just agree on everything) helps us to solidify our positions on our
beliefs. People who believe the same things as us don’t need to ask us to
explain our beliefs, and it’s really when we articulate what we believe and our
reasoning or understanding for it that we learn more about ourselves. So we
need people with different beliefs who respectfully challenge, listen, and
share experiences with us.
The beauty of interfaith dialogue starts when we make a
commitment to respect our dialogue partner and listen with an open mind when we
would rather ‘gift’ our partner with our own experiences. The importance of
interfaith dialogue stems from our rapidly changing world. I have access to a
small slice of the reality of the world. By engaging in respectful, open dialogue,
my understanding of reality is both solidified and questioned. If I keep in
mind that reality is more complex than I can understand, then I can accept
apparent contradictions that may one day seem straightforward. That’s useful if
I’m interested in understanding the world as it is, possibly so I can engage
with it in a smarter way. I try to keep in mind that I’ll always have biases,
only a few of which I may be aware.
My new mantra is that if I disagree with you, I’ll try to
remember that we both may be wrong and right. If I treat you with dignity, I’d
like to think I’m not too wrong. Note to self: make mantra catchier.